quantum aesthetics or

is aesthetics quantum of something else?

Joked – ignorantly – to myself re possibility of quantum aesthetics. Instead of wallowing in the joke, did a search that gave something like
http://www.gradnet.de/papers/pomo01.paper/Choi01.htm
http://aronkatsenelinboigen.net/Downloads/QUANTUM_AESTHETICS.HTML
http://gregoriomorales.eshost.es/brief%20introduction%20to%20quantum%20aesthetics.htm
http://www.quantumaesthetics.es/
http://www.archaeoconcept.com/
and

No Excuses: Go Nomadic

i think that what i had in mind was a focus on non focus.. The quantity, quanta, rather than the object, the singular, the spot.. ..and perhaps this is not as quantum aesthetics from the 90’s in the sense that I might be doing a dualistic approach here.. hummm.. i think that i definitely just wrote about this dualistically, however, it is not doalistic in the senses the:
– I think of this as an evolutionary element, perhaps of emergence.. (eg, instead of placing one ting, do many of similar kind of stuff and life might begin?)
– with quantum you can do a singular, eg via percpective/distance, not the other way around, hence these are not 2 opposites, but one is a critique of another in terms of a sequence. Or perhaps a link of the other in terms sequence, and the other is witin one’s spectrum.. eg the singular object/objective is within the quantum frequency spactrum, not the other way around..?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.