the if of then-lessness in a + b?

Language imagination is, I think, or in my mind, is a fascinating topic/subject/process/practice to be involved with.
The article here attempts to report a current debate about language and mind – however it seems (or perhaps the studies as well, have not read them so clueless) to focuse on a sort of if – then of language.
If languages do stuff with imagination – then what does it mean and how can we prove it, etc..

In my mind there is an awful lot of prejudicial thinking here regarding effects and meanings, which personally am not very interested in..
What the studies – and readers comments – do seem to demonstrate, is that languages have a link to how we might imagine the world. Link though, is a part of a sequence, not necessary of cause and effect but meaningless timespace. if a + b | and that’s all.

Perhaps a person speaking a latin derivatives does not imagine objects as having genders. Perhaps they don’t imagine the moon as a female and sun as a male. However, they can do that very easily with their language, where as in english imagining objects as genderless is just another sequence.
Whether or not and How these might mean or have affect/s – I think might require a fair bit of serious critical research..
However aesthetically, perhaps a latin derivative object imagines themselves in: if a(x+||y) whereas the english aesthetics might be more like: if a(1,0~) Now..
How do these aesthetics might trans into one another?
Will a meeting create new objects?
How might object imagine their aesthetics independent of our languages?

art and flexibility based on convenient needs – otherwise known as hypocrisy?

There seem to be a bunch of people that make objects which they term “art”. Once the “art” is used, they think it bestows added value, a numerical exchange value, which they seem happy to redeem.
On one hand the object becomes “special” because it might express some cultural value and meaning. On the other hand, such value and meaning added to said object, is very easily translate-able to the function of numerical exchange such as money..?

#art blackhole questions: the objects/elements around the gallery? #BDF13 (elements as “the elements”? Are the elements a gallery?) (objects internationalised?) (object as a name or a pun?) (OOP and a gallery?) (objects, elements, images, and HTML?) (OOP as out of place as a gallery?) (OOP as Alley Oop in a gallery?) (another Out Of Place gallery?) (metaphorical objects in a metaphorical gallery?) (between and objects and place – are they all entities?) (an object, a place in a gallery?) (the gallery as a space for science?) (art’s basic elements for galleries?)