Skip to content

truth false scopes?

was looking at haskells’
Prelude> True == True
True
Prelude> True == False
False

say colour == true
when colour == true
all else == false

could have been

all colour == false
all else == true

however,

lets see if we can go beyond the false/true by using either one of them, or something else?

colour == no-True
all else == true

or

colour == false
all else == no-False

however, this masks something that isn’t stated but there:

once the colour is false then the description of it is true
also
once all else is not colour, that is true as well

opposite??

colour == true
all else == false

——–

colour == no-false
all else == false
it could be argued:
when all else == false as:
all else == not-no-false

however this seems limited, no?

compare with:

colour == true
all else == no-true
when all else == true

so false can be extended but requires more acrobatics? the acrobatics might be because the scope of false is more limited that these of true?

perhaps this is the scope of negative?

idk

am trying to describe operations and check their aesthetic scope, i think..

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.