Following recent Palestine oriented adventures, and a chat with a friend, am considering to take the wondering from IF citizenship into a possible TV documentary.
Lets question citizenship from ownership point of view. We have net citizenship, state citizenship, digital citizenship, etc. – and a fair few people who need one of these but are being denied.
We have refugees and migrants that risk lives for suitable citizenships, however, IF one gets it, are citizenship owned, or more like an iphone – some rental system? IF rental, are they worth killing and dying for?
So.. I have a citizenship to give away. Give it for love. Give it for life. Give it for suitability. Give it for desire.
Any possibility to give?
Any other adventures?
A citizenship that was made via a community of refugees, which creates other refugees, and denies refugees – in a land of in-between that is, in itself, sort of a refugee element. No?
Here are the tv pitching link. Not sure am actually going to do TV as am full of reservations about the commerciality embedded in TV – however, could that not be a part of the story??
MTV Veteran: “My Pitching Secrets. The Top 5 Mistakes Producers Make. And How to Avoid Them!”
Pitch Proper – We’ve Helped Hundreds Reach Millions
and the mugger, each with their own way of fussing and taking what’s not theirs?
..al on under 1 roof of the independent.. (waitrose, midclassartistocracy, mugger, independent,??)
its beginning to bug me that some apps will not be installed because of the old os version on my phone..
should i go for android or try something for free..?
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Devices/u8815 (not so free actually)
ffos is not ready yet..
a + b
a + bb
a + b + ab
aaaa A aa + b
b + + a
bb + +
a | b + / + / -> bbaa
a a + b / a + b -> aaaabb
i think that because of stuff i imagine to have been through, the language of imagination is that of links. suggestive links, crossing links, sequential links, etc. – however links they are.
This disturbs me because:
– i am probably wrong, there must be other elements – irreducible/primes – of the imagination lingo-material.
– i do not know now how to do that language in a way that its materials are indeed links rather than visions/reflection of links.
the other disturbance in my mind is that of known/knowledge/past.
I thought that it seems reasonable/authentic/honest to claim that I know stuff from past. hence search is from spacetime of knowing rather than towards utter unknown. this way, i felt that basing on the known rather than focusing on the un of knowns, can help imagination and search go wilder.
However, in reality, do I really know the past of my futures? Do I not keep reassessing, checking, criticising precisely because i know not..?
a curiosity..? (more likely..)
junky is conflated with a craft junky’s wishfulwould you pay anything for
this piece of junk?is this a bit mad about imagination orif you imagine
china as a future, then perhaps you fancysearch sequence #000,1.a? or just
was checkingoath as a softwareDeaf interperter at Mandela’s memorial could
notIndia’s democracy in a trans?Uruguay’s marijuana experiments – in
freedom we trust?when freedom is google, ms, twitter, apple, fb
andexpression and manifestation in art and a fewentangled in entangled
entanglements or juststill on edge.org <http://edge.org> and pessimism’s
negativeedge.org <http://negativeedge.org> and a sort on ideas about
chinastring, sequences, gravity, rhythm, order anddna expression and
materials shared with aliens ormid-day-ish links dumpPost navigation
name bordering with censorship?
Normally, when I hear Optimism, am feeling that something must Be wrong, missing, misleading, or any other sorts of negatives…
Optimism frightens me.
Pessimism in my mind, comes as a possible reality that is mixed with a sense of disappointment.. As if the pessimism would have liked to be, or was, a bit optimistic – but then got burned by that ism to the extent of being dissapointed.. (wish it was X – but alas, it is Y..)
Here, it seems that stuff like:
The first three talks this morning have been optimistic. We’ve heard about the promise of big data, we’ve heard about advances in emotions, and we’ve just heard from Fiery, who very cleverly managed to find a way to leave before I gave my remarks about how we’re understanding something deep about human nature. There’s a risk that my remarks are going to be understood as pessimistic but they’re really not. My optimism is embodied in the notion that what we’re doing here is important and we can do it better.
Takes optimism and pessimism to different levels, to sort of ideologies. You should be optimistic, else people will think negatively of you?? WTF??
I am wondering whether it is possible to argue that categorisation – also that of objects, and object types – is actually a practice that somehow might deny the process of search..
It seems that, at least in the sense of Presentation, categories come after a search process… I am not saying that one is more important, nor that if one comes before another, it must have a priority. However, I think that one should be – as they are – sequential elements of each other.. If indeed they are a part of a sequence..
Also, I think that if we can remain within the search as a sequence of its own, it can perhaps provide a new, or rather different way in a radical sense, to interact with the world..(?)
Perhaps an element is Negotiation..
I think, based on observations** that negotiations are searches because after doing that process for a while, we get the ability to categorise/know-X-proceedures and have a sort of formula/algorithm/machine to do that activity/process..
In that sense, art, as a harsh blackhole kind of *activities* is the kind of stuff that to be is uncategorised..
There are some arguments I have heard re art being pre-lingo lingo.. Perhaps related..?
http://www.zompist.com/gen.html – checked this and somehow got http://conlang.org/resources/ which bumped me into: http://www.zompist.com/chinawords.html when notices that perhaps geisha has “art” in it.
http://www.memidex.com/geisha – towards the end of the “page” where it seems like “art” refers to entertainment/perfomative-acts like singing & dancing..
I now wonder if this might also have anything to do with the survival thoughts/concerns? eg – http://itchy.5p.lt/academic-anthropological-view-of-art-and-survival