ok.. the other one gone kind of formal imho..
if
a + b
a might be single entity or a single cluster
+ is an addition activity
b might be another single entity or a cluster
however, as a search language/organism a + b can not stay as is, it needs linking.. For example, we can now introduce dimentional linking where:
a might be micro single entity or micro a single cluster
+ is an addition activity
b might be a macro single entity or a macro cluster
perhaps in this way we have:
a + b
a + bb
or..
because there is a + b it doesnt hve a closed feel like when its b+b=c
a + b want to have mates, links, they are incomplete yet complete in that.. check:
a + b
and
a + bb
if they collided
a + b -> <- a + bb
we will always have an element bb
a + bb + b
for example
now they have their own linking logic yet retain imagination practices on their own.. and together
so they can emerge other stuff
for example:
abb + b + + where abb is the 2 micro and macro together and + are more timespace entities than simple additions.
-----
in that case i think we can say that iI might be a reality?