oath as a software

and software as declarations?

Reads like someone’s desperate wank of self righteousness. With all the positivistic and simplistic terms. (there is a diff between attempting to tell yourself you are positive, to being positive.. Like between being simple and using terms thoughtlessly.. eg conflating between art and craft..)

However, I think its aesthetically interesting, as an imagination because the oath, taking a declarative path of intention promises that become aims to achieve, is a very software/programming/code kind of gesture.. No?

What might emerge out of such an act, the self righteousness of intent..?

..Or stuff we can not foresee – hence emerge rather than generated by – but feel “intended for good” about..?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.